Judgment
OLABODE RHODES-VIVOUR, J.S.C. (Delivering the Leading Judgment): By a letter dated 11 June 2008 the Appellant was given Presidential approval to import 500,000 metric tones of bagged cement into Nigeria. The importation was to commence in June, 2008 and conclude in December, 2008.
Based on the letter of approval the Appellant applied for and obtained Letters of Credit from Union Bank of Nigeria for US $41,000,000.00 (Forty One Million Dollars) and US $8,280,000.00 (Eight Million Two Hundred and Eighty Million Dollars) 80,000 metric tonnes of bagged cement arrived in Nigeria in four shipments. Three of the ships were allowed to berth. The 3rd Respondent issued instructions to the 1st Respondent to stop the importation of cement into Nigeria. The directive of the 3rd Respondent also prevented other ships with the remaining bagged cement from berthing.
The 1st Respondent accepted customs duties for the bagged cement that were allowed into the country. Entreaties to the third Respondent to lift the embargo were turned down. The third Respondent even turned down an appeal by the second Respondent to allow the ships to berth.
Frustrated the Appellant filed an action in the Federal High Court, it sued the Respondents and got a Court order on 18 December, 2009 against the Respondents. That Court ordered that the ships with the bagged cement should be allowed to berth and their cargo discharged. The Respondents did not obey the Court Order, despite a directive from the Acting President, Mr. G.E. Jonathan in March, 2010. The cargo was badly damaged and became toxic products. As a result of the actions of the Respondents, the Appellant became heavily indebted to his Bankers. To recoup his losses he instituted Suit No.
FHC/L/CS/1443/2009, against the present Respondents.
By a further Amended Originating Summons the Appellant as Applicant claim is as follows: 1.
An Order of Mandamus compelling the 2nd Respondent to wit: (a) To issue an exemption certificate for the 500,000 metric tons of cement imported or to be imported by the Applicant for which Presidential approval was granted to the Appellant and covered by the 4th Respondent from the purported ban by the President in October 2009. (b) To instruct all the relevant agencies under the Ministry of Finance including the 1st Respondent to allow the discharge and clearance of the Cargo imported or to be imported under the approval granted by the 4th Respondent in any or all Nigeria Ports. 2.
