For the definition of "memorandum of understanding", in Black's Law Dictionary, 8th edition at page 1006, the reader is directed to the definition of "Letter of intent, which is found at page 924 thereof and states thus:
"Letter of intent: A written statement detailing the preliminary understanding of parties who plan to enter into a contract or some other agreement.
– A letter of intent is not meant to be binding and does not hinder the parties from bargaining with a third party. Business people typically mean not to be bound by a letter of intent and Courts ordinarily do not enforce one; but Courts occasionally find that a commitment has been made "
(Underlining mine for emphasis)
From the above definition, it is clear that a memorandum of understanding or letter of intent, merely sets down in writing what the parties intend will eventually form the basis of a formal contract between them. It speaks to the future happening of a more formal relationship between the parties and the steps each party needs to take to bring that intention to reality. From the definition given above, notwithstanding the signing of a memorandum of understanding, the parties thereto are not precluded from entering into negotiations with a third party on the same subject matter.
The appellant merely picked or raised the issue of late submission of the reports after the suit was instituted at the trial Court which was two and a half years after the submission of the final report to it by the respondents. The question is, "Could the attitude of the appellant in that regard amount to waiver?To my mind, waiver or acquiescence presupposes that the person is to be bound where he is fully cognisant or aware of his rights, yet he neglects to enforce such rights, or chooses to benefit instead of another, either by both of which he might claim. See Auto Import Export v Adebayo (2005) 19 NWLR (pt 159) 544. It is my considered view that waiver is an issue of law, and it is an elementary principle of law, that parties do not plead law but only facts.
Continue reading Words and Phrases (2)
You have read the opening. Unlock the full library once and it stays unlocked - one payment, no subscription, the same library as the app.
- All 725 Laws of the Federation, A to Z
- 916 full judgments and 269 case collections
- 8,046 legal principles and 124 rules of court
- 343 drafts, with the Draft Builder
- The Law Dictionary - 31,442 terms
- Law School notes and 2,082 MCQs
Every Act, case collection and principle beginning with A, B or C is free to read in full, without unlocking - the same boundary as the Android app.